Back
The Roswell Controversy
Posted by Mac Tonnies, Friday, May 09, 2008 at 11:00 AM by Mac Tonnies
To newcomers to ufology, the alleged Roswell UFO crash of 1947 would seem to be the best case on record. If popular wisdom is to be trusted, the Roswell case incorporates everything an investigator might need to conclusively establish an extraterrestrial origin for UFOs: exotic hardware and alien bodies--hardly the sort of evidence one might expect from even the most ambitious of hoaxes. And the government's schizophrenic stance on the reality of the event positively begs speculation about some form of high-level cover-up--what nuclear physicist turned UFO researcher Stanton Friedman has repeatedly described as a "Cosmic Watergate."
The events at Roswell in the summer of 1947--dawn of the modern era of UFO sightings--constitute a daunting mystery that has come to adopt the trappings of myth. While some evidence suggests a nonhuman presence in the New Mexico desert, alternative hypotheses abound. Nick Redfern's "Body Snatchers in the Desert," a disturbing book that re-examines the case in light of the military secrecy prevalent at the time of the crash, posits that the supposed "alien" bodies were in fact those of unwitting Japanese test subjects who perished in an aerospace mishap. Although subjected to much criticism (mostly from within the UFO community), Redfern's hypothesis has yet to evaporate. Even if it ultimately fails to explain the eponymous "Roswell incident," it might lead to a broadened understanding of the military's role in the American Southwest at the beginning of the Cold War.
Perhaps the best skeptical study of the case to date is Karl Pflock's "Roswell: Inconvenient Facts and the Will to Believe." On the other side of the fence, Kevin Randle's "Roswell Revisited" and "The Roswell Encyclopedia" emphasize the credible witness testimony favoring an ET explanation. For those bothered by the notion of humanoid ETs at the controls of fallible flying saucers, it's worth considering the military's vested interest in the "alien" meme's potential as disinformation, a subject explored in Greg Bishop's revealing "Project Beta."
After grappling with the Roswell case for years, I'm honestly at a loss to explain it to my own satisfaction. We could be dealing with a legitimate UFO crash, a cover story to mask a dark chapter in military history or even a combination of the two. That something unusual happened seems certain, but by itself Roswell is far from the evidential bedrock many assume it is. Like most enduring controversies, the Roswell incident has become inordinately polarized by the credulous and the close-minded. In the face of insufficient data, the arguments advanced by spokesmen from both camps have become little more than embittered rhetoric.
Fortunately for ufology, Roswell is one case among hundreds of others with the capacity to teach us more about the phenomenon's origins.
Mac Tonnies
2 Comments:
 |
Posted by Crusader
May 22, 2008 at 06:05 AM
Yes, also read a popular book, The Truth About the UFO Crash at Roswell
|
|
Posted by Joseph Capp
May 10, 2008 at 11:28 AM
I suggest you read the book "A Witness To Roswell" Schmitt & Cary
11 people near death who were station at Roswell told only their families it was a ship and alien bodies. They did not tell UFO investagators they kept there oath till almost death. Who would ever do that? When everyone else went on to other UFO cases and the disinfo of mj12 these two perused Roswell for 20 years hoping to interview the witnesses before they died, this book was there reward. Did you know sheep eat balloons. So the sheep were smarter than pfocks. Now as far as Nick. He again insults the intelligence and Commander of the Roswell base and the many witnesses. They couldn't tell a crash. I don't know about you but the planes and missiles in the forties was still metal now exotic materials. It is amazing isn't it how these in the UFO community will insult the intelligence of the witness just to sell a book. The Witnesses who come out couragously and fodder for their pet theories at the time. The material was different very different. Read it yourself.
Joseph Capp
UFO Media Matters
Non-Commercial Blog
|
Leave a Comment
Back
